home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.crystalball.com!news
- From: Larry Weiss <lfw@oc.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: Schildt <- Advanced Books
- Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 16:55:03 -0600
- Organization: crystalball.com
- Message-ID: <3140BAC7.7608@oc.com>
- References: <8BA8405.02C70020DE.uuout@sourcebbs.com> <4he6hb$ahn@solutions.solon.com> <danpop.826121528@rscernix> <4hmojk$ij2@news.interpath.net> <4hmqqe$aoo@solutions.solon.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: external.oc.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I)
-
- Peter Seebach wrote:
-
- > Schildt sent me a fax explaining why he believes void main is legal by the
- > standard; I wrote back, but haven't heard anything about it since...
-
- What was the gist of Schildt's argument justifying void main() ?
-